The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On May 8, 2013, at around 23:35, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault on the victim’s face, part, etc. due to the son D (year 45) and monthly tax, etc., the owner of the son, who was the owner of the son’s house in the front line of the Seoul Northernbuk-gu Seoul Western-gu, and was in sight of d’s bomb by hand; and (b) committed an assault on the victim’s face, part, etc. due to drinking and spab

2. Determination

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished after the instant indictment, the instant indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.