1. The defendant shall make the Seoul Western District Court with respect to each share of 8/29 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Among the children of 5 South and North Korea born between father C and mother D, the plaintiff is 5 South and the defendant is 3 South and North Korea, and the plaintiff and the defendant are 3 South and North Korea.

B. The land and the housing indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) are originally owned by the mother D and 7 South Korea were living together in the old period. The remainder remaining after the Defendant, other than the Defendant, have been married to a different place, and only the Defendant has been residing in the instant real estate until now.

C. As the mother D died on April 16, 1982, father C and 7, on August 18, 1982, on the instant real estate, father C and 7 completed the registration of inheritance with the content that the deceased’s father E’s husband and wife E and the rest of father C receive 1/29 shares, and 4/29 shares, respectively.

on August 18, 1982, father C donated 4/29 shares of the instant real estate to the Plaintiff and completed the registration of transfer of shares in relation thereto.

(However, on March 26, 1983, Ministry C died of March 26, 1983.

The Plaintiff completed the transfer registration of shares to the Defendant on June 28, 1993 under the Seoul Western District Court Seodaemun-gu Branch of Seodaemun-gu, Seoul District Court No. 21800 on the portion of 8/29 of the instant real estate.

(However, the application for registration states the grounds for registration as "trade", and hereinafter referred to as "transfer registration of shares in this case"). E.

On August 12, 2006, the Defendant drafted a letter of commitment to the Plaintiff stating that “In selling or disposing of the instant real estate in the future, the Plaintiff shall pay to the Plaintiff the share equivalent to the Plaintiff’s 8/29 shares.”

[Reasons for Recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. (i) In this case, the Defendant denied that there was no title trust agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant at the time of the instant share transfer registration, and the Plaintiff’s shares in possession to be recognized as a homeless person in Seoul around 1993 as a homeless person.