logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.05.07 2019가단5236616
공유물분할
Text

1. The real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 shall be put to an auction and the proceeds thereof shall be deducted from the auction cost.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiffs and the Defendants are co-owners who own 2/13 shares of Plaintiff A, 3/13 shares of Plaintiff B, and 2/13 shares of Plaintiff B, respectively, with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).

B. The plaintiffs and the defendants did not agree on the partition of co-owned property of each of the instant real estate.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1 and 2 (including virtual number) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts acknowledged, the Plaintiffs, co-owners of each real estate of this case, can file a claim against the Defendants, who are other co-owners, for the partition of each real estate of this case.

B. As a matter of principle, partition of co-owned property in kind can be divided in kind as far as a reasonable partition can be made according to each co-owner's share. If it is impossible to divide in kind or in kind, or if it is possible to divide in kind, the auction of the goods can be ordered, and the above requirement is not physically strict interpretation, but it includes cases where it is difficult or inappropriate to divide in kind in light of the nature, location, size, use situation, and use value after the division (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Da4580, Apr. 12, 2002). In other words, co-owners of each real property of this case can be recognized by the evidence as follows:

arrow