logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.01.11 2016나60808
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff donated KRW 30 million to the Defendant, respectively, on July 21, 2009, and September 27, 2011, on condition that the Defendant, Rin-ri, supported the Plaintiff, on condition that he support the Plaintiff, and that the Defendant did not support the Plaintiff, the said gift contract is rescinded.

Therefore, the defendant shall return the 60 million won donated to the plaintiff.

(A) The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant lent the above KRW 60 million to the Defendant at the first instance trial, and the Plaintiff changed its assertion that the Defendant donated the above KRW 60 million to the Defendant with the burden of payment at the time of the trial. 2. According to each of the evidence No. 1, No. 1-2, and No. 2, the Plaintiff paid each of the above KRW 30 million to the Defendant according to the facts stated in the evidence No. 1-2, No. 1-2, and No. 2-3, Jul. 21, 2009 and September 27, 201.

However, there is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff donated the above money to the Defendant on the condition that the Plaintiff supported the Plaintiff, so the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow