1. In relation to the traffic accidents described in paragraph 1 of the attached list, automobile insurance contracts described in paragraph 2 of the same Table are followed;

The main lawsuit and counterclaim are also examined.

Following the fact that the liability for damages was established, the following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be recognized by comprehensively considering the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence 1 through 4, Gap evidence 10-1, 2, and 3.

The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract described in paragraph (2) of the attached Table 2 with respect to C Cost Star Vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is the driver of D New Daily XG car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B around 00:30 on July 2, 2008, by driving the plaintiff's vehicle, the national highways No. 56 on the salary 29,000-ri-ri 56 on so-called the IC direction was carried out by driving the plaintiff's vehicle.

During that, while the plaintiff's vehicle was broken, B was making a water signal at a point of about 30 meters after the plaintiff's vehicle left the vehicle while driving on emergency lights, etc. within the two-lane side of the side of the side of the two-lane.

The above road is a road not installed separately from the side length.

The Defendant was driving the Defendant’s vehicle along the two-lanes of the above road, but did not discover the Plaintiff’s vehicle and received the left rear part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle as the front part of the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident.” The Defendant asserts that the degree of injury of the Defendant caused by the instant accident was injured by the scambling and the unknown tensions, etc. due to the instant accident, and the Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the said tensions, etc., which the Defendant complained against, were caused by the Defendant’s scambrupt.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the statements Nos. 5, 6, 8, and No. 2-1, 2, 3 through 7 (including each number), the defendant shall use drugs, thothothic fluoric fluoric fluoral fluoric fluoric fluoral, etc. from July 2, 2008 to July 2, 2008.