The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In order to prevent additional violence of the victim, the injured party of the reasons for appeal has been forced to blickly blickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flick.

Therefore, although the defendant's passive act of defense falls under the legitimate defense or legitimate act, the court below found the defendant guilty, or erred by misapprehending the legal principles.

2. The following circumstances revealed by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the victim consistently stated that the defendant had consistently carried the breath of the victim and had no price on the part of the defendant's inside and outside, and ii at the scene at the time.

I also stated to the same purpose, and ③ was at the present site;

H and M had a vision between the Defendant and the injured party, but the injured party did not see that the injured party was a food price for the Defendant.

(4) According to the evidence records, 7, 11 pages, etc. that could not occur when the victim was exposed to a float face of the victim, the victim’s float was sold to the victim before the victim was floated.

It is difficult to see that the defendant's act is an act to protect the present unfair infringement of his legal interest under different premise.

It shall not be deemed a legitimate defense or legitimate act that has a reasonable ground as an act of resistance or passive resistance.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below that determined the defendant's act as an injury crime is not erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles, and the defendant's assertion is without merit

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.