logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.03.28 2013가단136986
손해배상 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

(2) In the event that the contract is terminated due to reasons falling under any of the subparagraphs of paragraph (1) and other reasons attributable to B, A shall pay to A the full amount of the rent and management expenses before the new lessee is secured: Provided, That A may claim for separate damages if the damage is incurred due to the termination of the contract, provided that A may remove at will the goods, facilities, and fixtures of the store within seven (7) days after the expiration or termination of the contract, even without taking legal action, if B fails to order the restoration of the store to its original state within the scope of seven (7) days after the termination or termination of the contract, A may arbitrarily remove the goods, facilities, and fixtures of the store without taking any legal action. In this case, B shall not raise any civil or criminal objection.

* Matters of special agreement

1. B shall be ordered to carry out the business until November 22, 2012, and shall commence the business until December 10, 2012;

In addition, Eul should install a cream or a cream card up to November 15, 199 with the scheduled date of open opening at the front of the object store.

(3) On the other hand, on November 9, 2012, Defendant A.S. Construction drafted and issued to the Plaintiff a certificate of payment guarantee to the effect that “If the lease contract was terminated and terminated due to reasons not attributable to the Plaintiff, Defendant A.S. Construction shall promptly return the deposit that the Plaintiff paid to Defendant A.S. Construction with respect to the lease contract within the instant building only to the amount that Defendant A.S. Construction received from the Plaintiff.”

(4) At the time of the conclusion of the instant lease agreement, Defendant Qats made oral agreements to the Plaintiff, via Defendant A, that Defendant Qats would provide the Plaintiff with KRW 30,00,000 for the interior cost under the instant lease agreement.

(c).

arrow