The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Determination of the main sentence of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable;

2. The sentence sentenced by the court below is within the recommended range of punishment according to the attached sentencing guidelines (from June to June).

In consideration of the defendant's reflectivity, the first offense, etc., the punishment was imposed in consideration of the amount of damage, the amount of long-term recovery of damage, etc.

The court below did not err in selecting and applying sentencing factors, and there is no change in sentencing factors in the appellate court.

Even if this court re-examines the sentencing factors and other factors of sentencing which are set forth in the sentencing guidelines for fraud, the determination of the original sentence is inappropriate.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit.

The dismissal under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act is dismissed.