The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On June 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 19:30 on June 23, 2012, the summary of the facts charged: (b) the victim E (the age of 47) was carrying his her her son F on a passenger car; and (c) the Defendant, who was engaged in traffic adjustment by mixing the above D hotel with the above D hotel, was able to prevent the victim’s car; (d) on the ground that the Defendant was able to take a bath for the victim; (e) the Defendant was able to look at the victim’s breath and boom on several occasions; and (e) when the G, who was engaged in traffic control together with the Defendant, was able to take the victim’s her hand with his her her son, and (e) when she did so with his her her son’s son’s son, who was in charge of assaulting the above employee H by assaulting the above her son.

As a result, the Defendant, together with G and H, inflicted an injury on the victim, such as dump satums in need of treatment for about three weeks.

2. Each of the above statements was made at the victim, F's investigative agency, and court as evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case. However, each of the above statements was made by the victim under the first investigation at the investigative agency, and the defendant was under the victim's left arms and under the victim's condition that G would take off the victim's left arms, and go back to G, while G would take back the victim's Da and the victim's Ga and her back back to G, the defendant took off the victim's shoulder right side, and again he again made a statement that G was at the victim's timber, shoulder, her chest, breast, etc., and the defendant was at the time of the victim's chest, and the prosecutor made a statement that G was closely connected with the defendant and the victim was at the time of the victim's back, but in this court, the defendant made a statement to the effect that it did not memory any of the victim's right time after this case occurred.