Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, for six months, and for four months, for defendant C, respectively.

except that this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On June 2, 2016, A was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Regulation of Similar Receiving Acts in the Incheon District Court's Branch Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 9 of the same year.

Defendant

A operated the Seoul Gwanak-gu Center for Similar Receipt of G, and Defendant B, as a subordinate business operator of Defendant A, operated the Daegu Jung-gu District Center for H 322, and Defendant C, as a subordinate business operator of Defendant B, conspired to receive similar duties against many and unspecified persons while working for the said Center as a subordinate business operator of Defendant B.

No one shall make a similar receipt of investments under an agreement to pay the total amount of investments or an amount in excess thereof to an unspecified number of unspecified persons in the future without obtaining authorization, permission, registration, reporting, etc. under Acts and subordinate statutes.

Nevertheless, around January 2015, the Defendants made an investment in the form of shares in the shares of the Chinese Culture Property Exchange, which is a government-invested institution invested by the Chinese government, to I at the above-month Punishment Center on March 1, 2015, the shares of the 18th of each month have increased twice and 32 times have increased over five months.

Of them, 15% of them shall be deducted from fees, 20% of the remaining amounts shall be used for the operation of shopping malls, 20% shall be re-invested, and 60% shall be paid out of cyber money.

It is clear investment guaranteed by the Chinese government.

Around the 26th day of the same month, after the business explanation was given, the transfer was made to the account of a bank of this person in one page, and the transfer was made from that time to the account of a bank of this person.

6. Until January 1, 200, a total of 130,000 won was received from 9 persons in total as shown in the list of crimes in the annexed sheet of crimes.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to receive similar goods without obtaining permission or filing a registration report under other Acts and subordinate statutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made with respect to J, K, L, M, I, and N;

1. Each complaint; 1. A complaint;