logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.08.24 2015가합109919
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiffs are parents of D (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”), and the defendant is the medical foundation that operates the E Hospital (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Hospital”).

On March 20, 2014, Mangian began to appeal to the U.S. and Gutoty, and on March 21, 2014, shows symptoms, such as Gutotopy, heat, rheat, clurine, and snow stations, and around 11:40 on March 23, 2014, the Defendant hospital’s medical staff provided her to the emergency room of the Defendant hospital (hereinafter “the first internal source”) with the Defendant’s accompanying the Defendant’s consent (hereinafter “the first internal source”). From around 12:18 to around 15:20 on the same day, the Defendant hospital’s medical staff provided her pulmonary examination to the GH, and her 2nd day after the date on which the 1st day after the 12:6th day after the 10th day after the 10th day after the 2nd day after the 10th day after the 2nd day after the 2nd day after the 1st day after the 2nd day after the 2nd day after the 2nd day.

After the second internal source, the deceased was treated as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, etc. from the medical personnel of the defendant hospital, but was killed by an satise shock caused by misappropriation around 20:18 on the same day.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 6, 8, 9, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 7, and the result of the court's entrustment of the medical record appraisal to F Hospital in this Court, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital asserted the purport of the whole pleadings by the plaintiffs, which caused the death of deceased children by negligence as follows, are liable for compensation for damages suffered by deceased children and the plaintiffs.

The medical personnel of the defendant hospital did not fully conduct necessary tests, such as blood tests of the deceased at the time of the first internal examination.

arrow