Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the costs of KRW 17,64,245 against the defendant and its related costs from June 15, 2016 to Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B.

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following “the second higher portion”, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance in the same part is "C. 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance"

The portion below the "liability for the calculation and payment of retirement allowances" shall be as follows:

"......"

The Defendant’s annual leave allowance and retirement allowance are 3,313,973 won and the annual leave allowance of Plaintiff A is 14,350,272, and the amount of retirement allowance is 14,350,272, the amount of annual leave allowance of Plaintiff B is 3,037,80 won and the amount of retirement allowance is 10,057,290, and the amount of annual leave allowance of Plaintiff C is 3,313,973 won and the amount of retirement allowance is 13,94,135, there is no dispute between the parties.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay Plaintiff A 17,664,245 won (i.e., annual leave allowances of KRW 3,313,973,973 retirement allowances of KRW 14,350,272) and for this, from June 15, 2016, and from June 13, 2095,098 (i.e., annual leave allowances of KRW 3,037,808 retirement allowances of KRW 10,057,290) and for this, from March 15, 2017, from the 14th day after the date of Plaintiff B’s retirement to the 3,308,108 won (i.e., annual leave allowances of KRW 3,313,973,94,135) and the amount of damages calculated from the 14th day after the date of Plaintiff A’s retirement to the 16th day after the lapse of 20th day from the 14th day of each of the ruling.

[....]

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are accepted within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed, without merit. Since the judgment of the first instance is partially different from this conclusion, the defendant's appeal is accepted and the payment is ordered in excess of the above recognized amount.