beta
Text
1. The counterclaim of this case shall be dismissed.
2. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) amounted to KRW 8,290,575 and its amount.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the main claim
A. (1) In fact, the Defendant entered into a contract with Nonparty 1, located in Japan, to re-export salt farms (hereinafter “instant cargo”) (hereinafter “instant cargo”).
(2) As to the freight transport of this case, the Defendant entered into a freight forwarding contract with Nonparty A, and the Defendant’s factory located in Gonam-do entered into a transportation contract with the Plaintiff with respect to the maritime transport between B and the Busan-do Port Port to the Busan-do Port Port Port, and accordingly, the Plaintiff issued a bill of lading with the Defendant as the consignor on June 20, 2014, and as the consignee and the consignee as the consignee, the B/L was issued.
(3) On June 18, 2014, the shipment of the instant cargo arrived at the port of the Republic of Korea, which was final in the Republic of Korea on June 22, 2014.
(4) (A) On June 22, 2014, as a result of the instant cargo’s refusal to receive on the ground that the instant cargo was deteriorated, the instant cargo was stored in the container gate for 23 days from June 22, 2014 to July 14, 2014, and as a result, the instant cargo was stored in the container gate for 486,00 won in Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, 6,000, and 202,347, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, the sum of KRW 694,347, and 347, Japan.
(B) Accordingly, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to return the instant cargo again to Busan. On July 14, 2014, the Plaintiff loaded the instant cargo and transported it to Busan on July 16, 2014, and the costs of KRW 2,139,764 were incurred at the transportation cost.
(C) After the instant cargo was shipped into Busan, the Defendant received the instant cargo on October 20, 2014, and thereby, the Defendant incurred KRW 8,732,820,00 in total, including the cost of storage 2,01,820, and the cost of storage.
(5) On September 2, 2014, the Defendant agreed to reduce the amount of damages by the delay in receiving the instant cargo.