The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (two months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant made a confession of the crime of this case and reflects in depth the defendant's testimony, the contents of the defendant's testimony cannot be viewed as an important matter that affects the judgment of the conviction of the related accused case of D, which is the father, and the fact that there is no same criminal record is favorable to the

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was registered as the owner of the F Child Care Center building and did not participate in the operation and disposition, and the Defendant testified with a false testimony about the specific matters as if he were directly involved in the operation and disposition; and (b) perjury requires strict punishment for committing a crime that impedes the proper exercise of the judgment authority, which is a judicial action of the State, and the discovery of substantial truth; and (c) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, means and consequence, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.