logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2012.11.21 2012고정1447
업무방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was elected as the president of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu council for the branch owners and the director of the management division, and the defendant B was elected from the 7th floor of the Council, and the victim E, who operates the D History in the 7th floor, was in a dispute relationship with the husband F (the former president) of the victim E, and was in a conflict with the victim's friendship or business.

1. The Defendants conspired, around August 6, 201, at the facility management office of the above commercial building, and around August 6, 201, ordered G to “A from August 8, 201 to August 8, 2011, suspend the operation of the elevator on the fourth floor above the above commercial building by the staff H in charge of facility management who received the G’s instruction from August 8, 201 to 08:00 of the same day, thereby hindering the victim’s friendship or business.

2. On August 201, 201, the Defendants conspired with the Defendants, and instructed G to “the suspension of the operation of the elevator new wall from the underground 4 to the 8th above ground level,” and obstructed the victim’s friendship or business by stopping the operation of the said elevator during each new wall period from August 25, 201 to September 20, 201 by ordering G to “the suspension of the operation of the elevator new wall from the underground 8 to the underground 4th above level.”

3. On August 13, 2011, the Defendants conspired to order the head of the shop leader and the staff in charge of J of the U.S. dollars to stop the removal of waste, and the J and K from August 13, 201 to suspend the removal of waste by dratian for approximately one week from August 13, 201, thereby hindering the victim’s friendship or business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of witness E, J, H, G, L and M

1. Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the witness E, J, H, G, Article 186 and Article 187 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow