logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.06.30 2015나759
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The pertinent Plaintiff is the occupant of the apartment in Kimhae-si, and the Defendant is an occupant of the same apartment as the same apartment, who has worked as the same representative of 106 apartment units.

B. On July 14, 201, at around 11:45, the Defendant, upon which the criminal judgment against the Defendant was final and conclusive, filed a claim for a summary order with the court on the following facts: (a) around July 14, 201, at the polling station for the representatives of community credit cooperatives established in Kimhae-si apartment senior citizens; (b) on the ground that the Defendant unfairly participated in the Plaintiff’s voting process, who was a voter, it was subject to D from D on the ground that the Defendant took part in the voting process; and (c) accordingly, the Defendant filed a claim for a summary order against the Defendant to the effect that “the head of the seed flap, apartment horse flab, flading, flading the flae, flading the flae, and fla

On July 19, 2012, the court of first instance found the Defendant guilty of the above criminal facts and sentenced the Defendant to a fine of KRW 5 million. The Defendant appealed against this, but the appellate court rendered a decision to dismiss the Defendant’s appeal on November 23, 2012 on the ground that the appellate brief was not submitted within the deadline for submitting the appellate brief. The above decision became final and conclusive around that time.

C. The plaintiff's judgment on perjury and perjury becomes final and conclusive

arrow