1. Defendant A

(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year;

(b)Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Under the underlying facts, Defendant A is a personal investor who specializes in the purchase and sale of shares using HTS and has been operating the same club of shares related to the shares of “I” and “J” after the Internet portal site from around 2009. Defendant B is a person who has been engaged in the general affairs of the above car page. Defendant D and C are members of the above car page, and Defendant D and C are members of the above car page, and have reported and traded shares.

No one shall trade, entrust, or be entrusted with, listed securities or derivatives in the market with an intention to attract anyone to trade such listed securities or derivatives in the market, creating a misleading appearance of active trading or causing a fluctuation in the market price of such securities or derivatives.

Nevertheless, Defendant A and B, a relatively small amount of shares in the share price, including “Tho Chemical Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd.,” “S. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd.,” “S. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd., Ltd. Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd.”), “as soon as they purchase their own ability during the defense or important time zone,” “self-stocks will defend their own price decline by purchasing their own shares in installments,” “PP, etc., and “S. Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd.,” and “one week, each time every hour.”

“.....” and “heat f......,”

The facts charged are that Defendant A, B, and C had the members of the Kafe informed of the specific method of ordering, and encourage them to artificially increase the share price of the above items or order the purchase to prevent the price decline, and that Defendant D, B, and C ordered Defendant D and C to purchase the market price.

However, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone that there was such an instruction relationship.

Unlike the lack of recognition, it is difficult to recognize it.