logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.13 2015가단174883
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) The net C shall be 1914. (Seoul 3 years);

4. 5. The land before subdivision was divided into the land in attached Tables 1 and 2, 5. The land before subdivision was divided into the land in attached Tables 1 and 2, 646 square meters (hereinafter “land before subdivision”).

(G) According to the old land cadastre, the land in the annexed list 1 and 2 was restored from the land before subdivision in 1965, and according to the subsequent land cadastre, the annexed list 2 is, unlike the previous land cadastre, divided on May 16, 1973.

Attached Form

Land listed in the List 1 was restored in the name of E on January 16, 1954 by means of a reinstatement registration, and the land listed in Schedule 2 was restored in the name of F on March 12, 1954 by means of a reinstatement registration.

C. On January 13, 1975, the Defendant purchased the land listed in Attached List 1 from E and completed the registration of ownership transfer on February 22, 1975. On December 24, 1974, the Defendant purchased the land listed in Attached List 2 from F and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the same day.

The deceased on September 21, 1917, G succeeded to the property solely with the family inheritance. G died on October 28, 1950. At the time of the death, H and his wife inherited the property solely with the family inheritance. H died in September 1987, 1987, and H inherited the property solely by I.

I died on January 2, 2015, and there are J, K, and the plaintiff as his child.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-3, 5, 6, 9, 14 (including provisional numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul 1-3 evidence, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. (1) As to the land before the division, for which the plaintiff's assistance division C was assessed

6. Since the war on 25.25. The restoration registration has been made on the land investigation division. In principle, it is not normal that the restoration registration should be made by the mother parcel number, and the restoration registration in the E/F name made by divided lot number, such as the above land.

arrow