1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. 1) The plaintiff's defendant is the owner of the plaintiff's ground E-204 (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").

The Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s right to lease, management, etc. was entrusted to the Defendant’s Intervenor, and the Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor managed the above apartment. Nonparty F, April 30, 201, with respect to the Defendant’s Intervenor and the above apartment, the forest trade company (hereinafter “forest trade”).

(3) A deposit amount of KRW 20,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 800,000 (this shall be increased to KRW 950,000,000) in its name, and the term of April 30, 2013 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

(2) On April 23, 2013, F resided in the above apartment, and delivered the above apartment to the Defendant joining the Defendant. On the other hand, the Plaintiff was requested from F to lend money from F on November 2012. In order to secure collateral from F with the Defendant’s consent, the Plaintiff secured the above lease contract deposit as security by changing the lessee of the instant lease contract to the Plaintiff, and lent the said money to F. Upon the completion of the instant lease contract, F was transferred to the Defendant, and the Defendant was obligated to pay the Plaintiff the remainder of the deposit, 14,320,000 won, which was deducted from the unpaid monthly rent and public charges, and delay damages therefrom, and the Defendant F was likely to be subject to compulsory execution against the instant lease contract from a large amount of credit bad debt, and thus, the Plaintiff was also subject to compulsory execution under the name of F, a lessee, under the name of F, under the name of the Plaintiff’s first lessee.

(b) do not secure this as security.