A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 15, 2019, the Defendant appeared as a witness of a violation of the Labor Standards Act against Defendant B at the Daegu District Court 39, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, 14:30, and took an oath.

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case of violation of the Labor Standards Act is that “B did not pay nine wages, including Workers D, who worked for the said company from January 29, 2018 to February 13, 2018, to the actual operator of C, 14 days after the date of retirement,” and the Defendant submitted the confirmation document that C was the actual operator himself/herself.

Therefore, the defendant answers to the prosecutor's "Ne's answer to the question "Ne's answer to the question "I have directly interviewed with D's staff", "Ne's answer to the question "I have directly interviewed with D'," "I have answer to the prosecutor's question "I have directly d'," "I have answer to the question "I have d'," "I have d' how I have d't meet at any time," "I have asked the prosecutor's answer to the question "I have called d'," "I have asked the witness who has called, and the wage agreement was a witness and only I have made a witness," "I have asked the prosecutor's answer to the question "Ne's answer," "I have asked the prosecutor's answer to the question "I have interview with D's witness," and "I have made a interview with the prosecutor's questions "I have given d' that I have given d', "I have given d'."

However, in fact, the defendant is only a representative in the name of C, and the actual operator B, and the worker D directly met with B on January 24, 2018 at the old E-U.S. factory due diligence around 11:00, and at the time, interview was conducted with the defendant by telephone communications.