Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On August 26, 2014, the Defendant discovered one observer GX smartphone (1,100,000) at the victim E-owned market price at the time of calculating the location of the D convenience store located in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and told F, an employee of the above D convenience store, that “I want to find a son at home” was the victim’s property.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement [the defendant did so with the above mobile phone in a convenient manner to find the owner's identity, and thus there was no intention to acquire it illegally.

However, the following circumstances recognized by each evidence of the ruling, i.e., the defendant's assertion that there is no special means or method to find the main identity of the mobile phone, but it brings about it, and the convenience store employees would find their main identity.

In light of the fact that the Defendant did not notify his personal information or contact information to his employee while taking the above mobile phone against him and did not notify his employee of his personal information or contact information, even though the Defendant confirmed that the above mobile phone was in a state of suspension, the Defendant did not contact the victim’s wife located in the above mobile phone address register, and the Defendant visited the convenience store to make a report on the loss of the above mobile phone and took the above mobile phone back to the Y police station and did not report it to the police station prior to this, there was an intention of unlawful acquisition at the time when the Defendant brought the mobile phone to the Defendant.

[H]

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statutes to A;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 329 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The Defendant is a H taxi engineer in the facts charged.

The defendant on September 23, 2014.