1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

On May 15, 2016, May 21, 2016, the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff insured vehicle CD at the time of the accident, and around May 21, 2016, at the time of the accident, the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”) in the situation of the collision near the Daejeon Seodong-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, the left left at the two-lane, and the insured vehicle of the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) at the three-lane to turn to the left at the three-lane, while the front left of the left of the Plaintiff vehicle and the front door of the right side of the Defendant vehicle were paid with the insurance money that was paid at the front of the right side of the Defendant vehicle, and KRW 200,000,000, self-paid charges of the insured vehicle of the self-paid vehicle of the Defendant

1. The circumstances leading to the instant accident are as follows.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements or images, and the purport of the whole pleadings, as to Gap's statements or evidence of Gap's 1 through 5 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap's 7 through 9

2. The Defendant’s defense prior to the merits 1) The Defendant established a settlement contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the ratio of negligence of the original Defendant vehicle since 14 days have passed since the date on which deliberation and decision of the E Deliberation Committee was served with respect to the instant accident, and the settlement contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was concluded. As such, the instant lawsuit on the automobile insurance is subject to the mutual agreement on the deliberation of the dispute

2) In the event that there are differences in respect of the validity or scope of a claim for trial which is guaranteed by the Constitution, the agreement to bring about the effect of a serious litigation law, such as waiver of a claim for trial which is guaranteed by the Constitution, is valid as to the circumstances that may be anticipated at the time of the agreement, and the decision should be made after reasonably interpreting the intent of the parties.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Da80449, Nov. 28, 2013). As to the instant case, the health care room for the instant case; and (1) The instant agreement is final and conclusive between the petitioner and the respondent when a decision of coordination is final and conclusive.