The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On July 15, 201, the Defendant, with knowledge of the facts charged, talked with the victim B at the hospitalization room in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with five taxi engineers E, etc., and damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “B, who had worked at the home room in the F Hospital, was a woman at any time and at any time a sexual intercourse was requested.” Furthermore, the Defendant, with his own bath, she was a place where she talks with the baby, and she was born with her sexual organ, and she was a place where she had sexual intercourse with her own children.”

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records of this case, it is recognized that the victim submitted a written withdrawal of complaint to the effect that he/she would not want punishment against the defendant around April 12, 2013, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.