Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:01 on April 6, 2020, the Defendant destroyed and damaged the entrance door door of the market price, which is the victim’s ownership, by under the influence of alcohol, on the part of the “D” in the operation of the victim C, located in Suwon-gu, Busan. In addition, the Defendant destroyed and damaged the building door door of the entrance.

2. On April 6, 2020, around 00:30 on April 6, 2020, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports on the crime described in paragraph (1) prior to the “F convenience store” located in Suwon-gu Busan Metropolitan City; (b) received voluntary demand from the police officers belonging to the Busan Southern Police Station G District District G District in Busan Metropolitan City; (c) received voluntary demand from H; and (d) took a bath for “Iskick; and (d) assaulted the breath of the H with the breath of the breath.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police officer's written statement of C and H 112 case handling photographs;

1. Relevant Article 371 of the Criminal Act, Article 371 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions of the Defendant, the age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of each of the instant offenses, the means and consequence of each of the instant offenses, the circumstances after the commission of the offense, the sentencing of similar cases, and all of the sentencing factors as shown in the trial process, shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account the following factors.

The favorable sentencing condition: The defendant shows the appearance of recognizing and reflecting each of the crimes of this case, and the sentencing condition that is disadvantageous to the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment except for the punishment imposed once by drinking driving for about 10 years. The obstruction of performance of official duties is legitimate.