(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.10.29 2015고정511

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.10.29 2015고정511

폭행등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C are the occupants who reside in the D apartment in the Asan City.

At around 10:40 on January 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 10:40 on the Asan-si D Apartment, the Defendant: (b) accessed the electric shock of the victim C (the 57 years of age, inn) and the electric wheel chairs using a flat, with the driver’s seat in the elderly room without permission; (c) assaulted the victim’s face on two occasions; and (d) damaged the safety of the market value of the victim’s 2.40,00 won at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Entry of the receipt; and

1. Application of each of the laws and regulations of the victim of violence and destruction, on-site ctv photographs, ctv pictures, ctv video cd.

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the ordinary concurrent crimes (Punishments imposed on the crimes of causing heavier property damage);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant guilty of the provisional payment order denies the charges by asserting that he/she did not cause any damage to the victim's face or safety. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment, i.e., that is, the victim, while driving his/her vehicle, testified to the effect that: (a) the defendant appeared to have observed that he/she is filling the electric wheelchairs in the electrical code side of the elderly base while driving his/her vehicle, and after driving the vehicle, he/she told him/her of the vehicle, he/she was able to say that he/she was able to remove the victim's inner eye from the floor at the time of 2 times of the victim's walk and drinking with the victim's desire, and that he/she was humped with the view that he/she was humped with the view that the victim's statement was completely consistent from the police to this court; (b) the victim reported to the police on

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2020.06.12 2020고정96

-대구지방법원 2017.06.15 2016가합2370

-부산지방법원 2017.02.13 2015고합557

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.01.24 2018고단2055

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.12.18 2015고단2107