Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) on October 24, 2016, around 08:55, the Defendant: (b) was under the influence of alcohol in front of the convenience store C in Osan-si B; (c) was on the entrance door of the above convenience store without any justifiable reason; and (d) was on the part of the victim D (27 years of age) who is an employee of the said facility, she laid into the above convenience store on the ground that it would be bad for the Defendant to see himself/herself.
followed. Does it be neglected.
We will die.
C."Intimidation".
2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim D can recognize the facts that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.