logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2015.07.08 2015고단59
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 09:40 on January 11, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (measures Taken after accidents) (hereinafter referred to as the “Road Traffic Act”), while driving a B low-speed car and driving a road in front of the D Do restaurant located in C at the early night at an aesthetic speed, the Defendant destroyed the said part, such as the Fone Star Cors, parked in front of the right side of the passenger car parked at the front side of the said car, and then went away from it, so that the repair cost amounting to KRW 677,774,00,00, would be damaged by the front side of the said car’s right side, and continued to move away from it, while continuing to go ahead of the H main line of the G operation in front of the said G operation.

Accordingly, the defendant did not take necessary measures to prevent and eliminate damage to road traffic even after the traffic accident that damages another person's goods.

The defendant was found guilty on the ground that there was a shock of a vehicle in parking and there was no scattering due to the accident, but the reported person who observed the accident caused another traffic danger or obstacle due to the attack of the defendant.

2. Around 09:40 on January 11, 2015, the Defendant driving a motor vehicle B in the direction of alcohol concentration of about 2 km from the D cafeteria located in Seocho-si, Seocho-si to the 09:45 day on the same day to the 2km road in front of the D cafeteria at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual survey report and photographs concerning traffic accidents;

1. Statement of employer-employed drivers, and statement of employer-employed drivers;

1. A vehicle estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports and investigation reports (processing opinions);

1. In relation to the criminal facts, the amount of blood alcohol concentration is very high in the choice of each fine under Article 148-2(2)1 and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic

arrow