The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (unfair punishment for six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, and twenty-four hours of sexual assault treatment lectures) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant’s mistake is recognized and agreed with the victim is recognized, the Defendant’s error appears to have undergone considerable psychological shock and aftermathing due to the instant crime committed in a closed space by the Defendant, and the Defendant’s error is not easy.

It seems that there is a distance from the attitude of reflectivity, even though the defendant's criminal act of this case concerns only the adverse impact on his family and social reputation rather than returning to the psychological decline and living difficulties that will be experienced by the victim in the future.

Considering such circumstances, considering the various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as prescribed by Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the Defendant’s age, sex, and environment, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed to be more severe than the Defendant’s mistake.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

【Registration, Disclosure, and Notification of Personal Information by the Defendant

However, the court below has already exempted the defendant from disclosure and notification of personal information, as well as the obligation to register personal information is not only a type of punishment determined by the court but also a type of punishment imposed by law, and the court's notification is nothing more than notification.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.