The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. On June 10, 201, at the office of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E Co., Ltd. around June 10, 201, the Defendant, C, and D of private documents: “Real estate sales contract” using computers;

(a) Real estate indication;

1. F site 1,214 square meters in Seocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do;

2. G site: 444 square meters in Seocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do;

3. 5 stories, parking lots and neighborhood living facilities, and accommodation facilities, 96.3 square meters, 2 stories, 31.91 square meters, 31.91 square meters, 31.91 square meters, 4 stories, 311.91 square meters, 31.91 square meters, 31.91 square meters, 331.91 square meters, 33338.62 square meters, and 338.62 square meters;

4. H site 334 square meters in Seocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do;

5. 130/226 of the area of 113 square meters of I site in Seocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do;

(b) the terms of contract;

1.The sale price shall be one hundred and fifty-five billion won worth (1,850,000,000) and shall be received as follows:

2. Where the buyer, before the remainder payment date, wishes to obtain a loan on the real estate as security, the seller shall immediately provide the real estate as security and receive any balance from the simultaneous loan institutions;

3.The seller shall deliver to the buyer the immovable property at the same time with the receipt of any balance;

4.Reversion of the profits generated in respect of this real estate and taxes and public charges shall be due and payable by the seller as of the date of delivery;

5. Other matters shall be governed by general practices.

On May 24, 2011, the seller prepared and printed the "J, K" at the Yangju-si of Gyeonggi.

After that, the defendant, C, and D have been prepared in advance on the name of K as stated in the name column of the seller.

Accordingly, the defendant, C, and D forged one copy of the real estate sales contract in the name of K, which is a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising.

B. At the above time and place, the Defendant and C/D used the forged real estate sales contract as if it were a document duly formed. The Defendant and C/D used the forged real estate sales contract to three employees in charge of mutual savings bank lending who are aware of the forgery.

2. A judgment prosecutor has submitted.