1. The Defendant’s compulsory execution against the Plaintiff is based on the payment order for the goods payment claim case No. 2014 tea2655.

Since there is no dispute between the parties that the defendant deposited KRW 460,00 as the execution cost and the defendant received all of the principal of the claim (the agreement between the parties to receive only the principal excluding delay damages among the claims under the above payment order) and the execution cost (the plaintiff's withdrawal of a compulsory auction application for the plaintiff's real estate after receiving it) on the payment order entered in the order against the plaintiff, compulsory execution based on the above payment order cannot be permitted any longer. It is so decided as per Disposition.