A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around April 19, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant, under the influence of force, expressed a large voice of “this Chewing feasia,” and interfered with the victim’s restaurant operation by drinking at the E-cafeteria operated by the victim of the D located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si.

2. On April 19, 2014, at around 23:20 on April 19, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties by a police officer G belonging to the F District of the Sungnam Police Station, Sungnamwon Police Station, who was called out after receiving a report at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph 1.

Seo Man-Ba

h. Chewing guila

In doing so, the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, G’s bridge can be boomed by drinking, and boomed by hand, thereby hindering police officers’ legitimate performance of their duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with Business, Selection of Imprisonment), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence shall be determined as the same as the order, in consideration of the fact that the accused has committed a crime and is divided into two parts, and that he is a Grade I physically handicapped person;