beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 40,676,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from May 11, 2012 to February 14, 2014.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant: (a) supplied B (the cost of construction work KRW 6.25 million) at Busan City, which was ordered by the Busan City as a non-party corporation SDR (the supervising company), Hanscom Co., Ltd., Ltd.; (b) and (c) had been in charge of installing optical cables on CCTV during the construction work (hereinafter “instant construction work”); (d) design (the cost of construction work is approximately KRW 15% during the pre-construction work, and approximately KRW 900 million) implementation (the cost of construction work is KRW 150,000), Hanscom Co., Ltd., Ltd. (the construction work to confirm whether the design is based on the site), Hanscom approval (the work to prepare documents in order to obtain approval for use from Hans, as the owner of Hans Cable Co., Ltd., Ltd. is using Hans Cable Co., Ltd.); and (e) connecting construction work to install a optical cable (the installation of a optical cable), connecting construction work, cable, etc.
B. Upon the Defendant’s request, the Plaintiff employed Nonparty C and D from December 16, 201 to February 25, 2012, with respect to the instant construction, and had Nonparty C and Dong E, prepare a field room and design work for the optical cable distribution in the 16 area discharged from Busan City, along with his/her and Dong E, and employed Nonparty F and G, for 17 days from January 16, 2012 to February 25, 2012, to conduct the preparation work, such as identifying the location and number of cables between the cable and the Dong office, identifying the cable number of lines installed in the Dong office, identifying the line number of lines installed in the Dong office, and requiring Nonparty H and I to submit a letter of application for approval before submitting it.
(See Attached Form of Claim for Construction Costs). (c)
However, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that it is impossible to continue the instant construction work due to the failure to pay the construction contract advance, and suspended the progress of construction from February 25, 2012, and on March 5, 2012, the Defendant and the Defendant on December 15, 2011.