beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A and B jointly share KRW 119,923,495 and KRW 67,225,827 among them, respectively.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) that includes an in-accidentd motor vehicle for E and F C (hereinafter “Plaintiff-W”), and the Defendant B is the owner of the vehicle Gotoba (hereinafter “Defendant-W”) and is operating the house with the trade name “I” in the north-gu Office H at the port of port of port as the owner of the vehicle Gotoba (hereinafter “Defendant-W”), and Defendant A is the spouse of Defendant B, who operates the above house with the above house, and Defendant C and D are the parents of J (hereinafter “the deceased”).
B. On June 16, 2014, at around 01:50, the Deceased left K for friendship with blood alcohol (hereinafter “victim”) on the Defendants’ vehicle in the condition of spreading 0.131% (hereinafter “victim”). The Deceased left the road in front of the Posco 1 located in the south-gu Masco 1, South-gu, and went beyond the ground floor by shocking the part of the side delivery seat.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.
Due to the instant accident, the Deceased suffered from severe brain damage (presumed) and died around that time, and the victim aboard the Defendants’ vehicles suffered from injury, such as thring of the uppermost, cutting of the fourth balance of the left-hand water surface, brain damage without any two open upper parts, and thring of external side of the outer framework of the right chain, lost the labor ability of 18% for the next two years due to the internal framework of the right chain, lost the labor ability of 6% due to the cutting of 4 balance of the left-hand side, and the labor ability of 6% due to the 4 balance of the upper-hand side was permanently lost the labor ability of 6% due to the thropical surgery and mixed water treatment (consuming pentma treatment) and the overall thalmatosis phenomenon appeared, thereby losing the labor ability of 27% due to the occurrence of the thropical climatic disorder, verbal disorder, pedestrian disorder, memory disorder, memory disorder, etc.
The plaintiff is from June 16, 2014 to October 29, 2014 in accordance with the special agreement on the non-insurance coverage.