Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with C on July 25, 1986. A.

On March 20, 2012, the Defendant passed a single sexual intercourse with B in a room in which it is impossible to know the number of Domo-gun of Gyeonggi-do.

B. Around March 30, 2012, the Defendant sent to the house of Gyeonggi-gun B with sexual intercourses with B one time.

C. Around April 11, 2012, the Defendant sent to the B and once sexual intercourse from the said B’s house. D.

On September 22, 2012, the Defendant had a sexual intercourse with E-B 201, E-B 201.

E. Around September 30, 2012, the Defendant sent to the Defendant with sexual intercourses with the above E B B 201 through B.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of the above A, and even at the same time and place as that of paragraph (1), he was sexual intercourse with A five times respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to C's accusation and marriage relation certificate;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: The former part of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act (a)

(b) Defendant B: The latter part of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Code (a point between the parties)

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes among concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of each Criminal Act (an aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes under subparagraph (e) of Article 1 of the Judgment with the largest number of concurrent crimes);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act or more;