A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 17:30 on December 4, 2008, the Defendant recommended K to the effect that K, a staff member of Pyeongtaek-si I, would have caused a traffic accident while driving a car of Hegel 2 on the road in front of the Gmatet located in Pyeongtaek-siF, and that he would not contact with it. On December 5, 2008, the Defendant would have caused an accident while driving his vehicle at the Jmoel located in Pyeongtaek-si I. It would be different that K, a staff member of the said D, would drive the vehicle at the same time. Ultimately, the Defendant urged K to the effect that “I would pay a fine on behalf of the head and pay a monthly wage of the same day and pay it by paying it on behalf of the head.”

As a result, on December 6, 2008, the Defendant instigated K to escape from crime by having K attend a survey team of Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station as if he driven the said vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of K, L, or M;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report;

1. Relevant Articles 151(1) and 31 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is very important in that the defendant intentionally makes it difficult for K to act as a criminal justice officer by making a false statement to a police officer, and interferes with the discovery of substantial truth, and the nature of the crime is very poor; K is given a summary order upon receiving a fine and fails to pay the fine, and thus, K is confined to the Pyeongtaek Detention House.

However, in consideration of the various sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the confession of the defendant and reflects against the defendant, the fact that the defendant has no criminal records for the same kind of crime and has no criminal records over the fine, etc., the punishment as the order shall be determined.