logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.04.04 2012고단3669
배임수재
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who represents the above corporation as a director of the social welfare corporation C (the representative is the husband of the defendant) and presides over all the affairs of the corporation; election of executives; and sale of the fundamental property of the corporation; in the case of dissolution, it shall obtain permission from the competent authority; and in the case of dissolution, it shall either contribute residual property to the social welfare corporation with a purpose similar to the above corporation or transfer it to the local government; and even if it is dissolved, it shall not take any pecuniary benefit; in the case of dissolution of the above corporation, the defendant would make payment of money to the above corporation as its representative director; and he would sell the above corporation as its representative director; 3 million won; 1.6 million won; 3 million won; 1.6 million won; 2.6 million won; 3 million won; 1.6 million won; 3 million won; 1.6 million won; 2 million won; 3 million won; 1.6 million won; 3 million won; 9.2 million won; 2 million won; 9.

2. Determination

A. The crime of taking property in breach of trust under Article 357(1) of the Criminal Act is established when a person who administers another person's business obtains property or pecuniary benefits in exchange for an illegal solicitation in connection with his/her duties. The crime of taking property or pecuniary benefits is established when an illegal solicitation is made between a donor of property or pecuniary benefits and a purchaser. Here, "illegal solicitation" refers to the extent that it necessarily constitutes the crime of taking property in breach of trust.

arrow