beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for three years, Defendant B, and C shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.
Defendant
A. Seizure from A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A, on November 2012, 2012, after receiving a proposal from a person who was named in the name of the Chinese national (known "K") to make a withdrawal of 5% of the amount of the money to be paid in return for a telephone financial fraud (titled "Sing") from a person who was named in the name of the Chinese nationality (known "K"), A had the cash card received from a member of the Bosing Fraud, and agreed to accept it, and agreed to withdraw the money from K to the money exchange, etc. designated by K upon receiving an order to withdraw the money when the amount of the money was remitted.
Defendant
A, on December 2012, 2012, proposed that Defendant C and B, who had been aware of prior to the example, would withdraw the amount of the damage from the singishing, would make a withdrawal of the amount of the damage from the singishing, 3% of the amount to be paid. Defendant C and Defendant B consented thereto. Defendant C and Defendant B conspired in order that the Defendants would share their respective roles in relation to the crime of the singishing and withdraw money by making the victims and the victims transfer the money by making the singish operators of the singishing fraud team, including K, and the victims transfer the money without the intention.
On January 2, 2013, at around 10:30 on January 2, 2013, the name in the name in the name of the Bosing Fraud, who is the first day of the Bosing Fraud, assumes the victim F by telephone to the staff of the police station, and falsely speaks that “When contact is avoided by the Financial Supervisory Service because it is the same as 070 Internet telephone damage, the contact would be avoided by the Financial Supervisory Service,” and subsequently, assumes the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service, and makes a false statement by telephone to “a remittance of money to a designated account because it may cause additional damage.”
However, in fact, the staff of the Bosing Fraudulent Group have thought to acquire money by deceiving the victim, and there was no need to transfer the money of the victim to another account in order to prevent the fraudulent use of the name of the victim or additional damage.
The victim is the victim.