A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 5, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness on the trial date of the criminal case that interfered with the performance of official duties by the above court 2014 High Order 2000 C, and decided to be punished for perjury if he makes a false statement after being notified by the presiding judge of the right to refuse to testify.

The facts charged of the instant case purported that “A police officer, in collusion with the Defendant, etc. of this case on March 14, 2014, in order to arrest the Defendant E, who is the Defendant’s seat, the Defendant was faced with D’s shoulder by hand, and C interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers’ duties by assaulting D’s shoulder with his hand.” The Defendant was indicted for the foregoing facts charged prior to the time of testimony, and was serving a fine of KRW 3.5 million on the support of Suwon Friwon, which was in progress in the appellate trial after being sentenced to a fine of KRW 3.5 million on June 26, 2014.”

It is essential to say that the defendant (C) is entitled to arrest the E as a current criminal in the above court because he is the prosecutor's "E".

The defendant and the witness have resistanceed against the police officer.

“I have come to sit and had no physical contact” on the water drinking “I have to do.”

I give testimony as follows: “I have no contact clearly with the prosecutor’s “not to be memory or not to be memory”

The testimony was made, “A witness and the defendant testified to be “for example,” on the physical appearance of “Is that Is the witness and the defendant would not have any physical contact with the police officer.”

However, in fact, the defendant committed violence against the police officer in concert with C, and during that process C appeared to have been witnessing the police officer.

Accordingly, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory as above and presented perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to protocol of witness examination;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;