logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.01.09 2017고단1117
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 15, 2017, the Defendant driven a DPoter II vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.176% in the direction of “C” located in Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun on August 15, 2017.

"2017 Highest 1170"

1. On November 9, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on the ground of a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

Defendant (a) was issued with a summary order as above, and was in violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice as stated in the facts constituting the crime of 1117 highest group, and was driving a DNA cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.12% at the 3km section of alcohol level at around 0.12% at the distance of 0.12% at the location of the 3km village located in the Gyeong-gun-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, on October 17, 2017.

2. On October 17, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driven a D Poter freight vehicle from around 21:45, while driving a D Poter, the Defendant was proceeding in the direction of Si/Gu/Eup in the direction of Si/Gu/Eup in the direction of Si/Gu/Eup in the direction of Si/Gun/Gu, the entrance of the Jin-gun, Jin-gun,

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to see the front side and to accurately operate the steering system and the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the duty of care in the front of the Defendant’s cargo vehicle while driving in the front of the Defendant’s cargo vehicle while neglecting the duty of care in the front of the drunk, and was behind the Victim E(37) driver who was going before the Defendant’s cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt dynasium, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 1117"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Notification of the results of the crackdown on the driving of alcohol, the statement of the situation of the driver under the influence of alcohol, the investigation report (the situation report of the driver under the influence of alcohol), and the results of the crackdown on the driving

arrow