beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
B A person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name "D" from the fifth floor of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the defendant is a so-called "head of office" to guide female workers to the room where female workers are waiting to receive money from the customers who find the above business establishment, and E is a female employee who conducts sexual traffic with customers in the guest room in the above business establishment.
At around 23:00 on June 13, 2012, the Defendant, along with B, received 60,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from the customer F, who was found in the above business place, and directed the said E to the guest room No. 7. At that place, the Defendant had the said E perform the act of similarity, such as breaking the sexual organ into the F’s sexual organ and breaking it by hand. From June 12, 2012 to the above temporary date, the Defendant, from around June 12, 2012, had the said business place receive money from the customer and let E, a female employee, take the sexual organ of the said customer by hand and scambling it.
As a result, the defendant conspired with B to arrange commercial sex acts.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;
1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on July 14, 2009 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. have the history of having been sentenced to the suspension of indictment on the grounds of a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., and the background, means, methods, and results, etc. of
It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.