logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.04.28 2015나300279
소유권이전등기
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The deceased S died on January 6, 1939, among the owners of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).

B. The deceased Y, as the deceased Y's Australian heir, succeeded to each of the instant real estate independently and owned it in Japan in the 1940s.

C. On February 15, 1961, the Plaintiff’s husband was adopted W, who was the Plaintiff’s husband while managing each of the instant real estate.

The deceased W was killed on June 15, 2010 while he acquired each of the instant real estate from the deceased V around that time.

The plaintiff agreed on the division of inherited property with the content that the plaintiff inherited each of the real estate of this case by himself between Z, AA, AB, AC, AD, and AE, which is another heir. D.

On the other hand, the net Y died on March 6, 1993. The Defendants and Nonparty H, I, J, K, L, M, M, N, P, Q, and R inherited each of the instant real estate owned by the network Y at the same ratio as that indicated in the separate sheet No. 2.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, 9 through 15, 19 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1, the inside market of the court of the first instance, salary-gun AF pages of the court of the first instance, salary-gun AF pages of the Daegu-gun AG Head, Daegu-gu Head, Daegu North Korean Head, Daegu-gu Head, Busan-dong Head, Busan-dong Head, and the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the result of the fact-finding inquiry about

2. According to the above facts of the determination as to the cause of the claim, the deceased W continued to possess the real estate from February 15, 1961 to June 15, 201, which was received from the deceased V, which was the date of the death. The possession of the deceased W is presumed to have been possessed in a peaceful manner by the intention of possession (Article 197(1) of the Civil Act). Accordingly, the deceased W acquired each of the instant real estate on February 15, 1981 after the lapse of 20 years from February 15, 1961, when possession of each of the instant real estate was commenced, and the Plaintiff as the inheritor of the deceased W.

arrow