The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

On September 4, 2014, the Defendant appealed from the Seogu District Court Branch for one year, who was sentenced to imprisonment for fraud, but was dismissed on December 12, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 20, 2014.

At around 23:00 on May 14, 2014, the Defendant entered a bar of the trade name C in Suwon-si B, and ordered the victim D (the victim D (the victim of 52 years of age, women) who runs the business up to 05:00 next day to be engaged in the business, to be 40 times of beer and 5 times of beer, but the Defendant did not have any intent and ability to pay the amount.

As a result, the defendant is the victim and received food equivalent to 3.50,000 won, such as alcohol and alcohol, and did not pay the price, thereby taking economic benefits equivalent to the above amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and the former part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act exempted from punishment (the principle of equity, etc. with the case where the judgment becomes final and conclusive at the same time as the above fraud);