The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. On February 15, 2013 and February 19, 2013, the Defendant did not interfere with the business of the victimized company, such as the facts charged (paragraphs 6 and 9 of the Crime List), and did not inflict any injury on F, or assault G.

The court below found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged.

B. Legal principles (as to obstruction of business), Defendant’s obstruction of business in light of the process, purpose, means and method, etc. leading to obstruction of business of the instant case is dismissed as a legitimate act.

Nevertheless, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles, which found all of the charges guilty as to obstruction of business.

C. The sentence imposed by the lower court (eight months of imprisonment and two years of suspended sentence) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 원심에서 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 현장사진 및 업무방해사진(증거기록 제34~37면), 각 업무방해사진(증거기록 제140면, 제226~229면)을 비롯한 원심 판시 증거들과 당심의 CD 재생(2013. 3. 4.자 공소사실 관련 영상) 시청결과에 의하면, 피고인이 2013. 2. 15. 및 2013. 2. 19.경 원심 판시 범죄사실 범죄일람표 제6항 및 9항 기재와 같이 피고인의 차량을 피해회사 공사현장 입구에 세워 두어 피해회사의 공사업무를 방해한 사실, 2012. 11. 29. 피해자 F에게 약 14일간의 치료가 필요한 대퇴 으깸손상 등의 상해를 가한 사실, 2013. 3. 4. 피해자 G의 멱살을 잡고 머리로 피해자 G의 가슴을 들이받는 등 H와 공동하여 G을 폭행한 사실을 충분히 인정할 수 있다.

The court below's finding the defendant guilty of each part of the facts charged is just, and there is no error of law by mistake.

B. Whether any act of determining the misapprehension of the legal principle is justifiable and not unlawful as it does not violate the social norms.