Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fines, they shall be prohibited.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On July 29, 2015, the Defendant, at around 19:00, at the conference place for the representatives of the occupants of D apartment houses in Naju-si, and on June 24, 2015, the fact was found to have been seated by the representatives of the representatives of D apartment occupants, who were in charge of the meetings, including the victim E, who was a general director of the same conference, even though the right to audit and inspect D apartment occupants’ representative meeting was lost on June 24, 2015.

Although the Defendant demanded the above E to move to the meeting room and to move from the meeting room, he did not comply with the victim’s demand to leave the meeting room without good cause.

B. The Defendant, at around 19:00 on August 19, 2015, at the same place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1-A., the Defendant: (a) went to the chair of the representative of the meeting, such as the Victim F (45 years old); (b) received the victim E’s demand for eviction from the victim during the conversation with G (41 years old); and (c) rejected the victim’s demand to withdraw from the meeting without good cause.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant, in around 19:00 on July 29, 2015, at the representative conference meeting of the occupants of D apartment houses, and on June 24, 2015, even though he/she was disqualified as the representative of D apartment occupants’ representative meeting on June 24, 2015, the conference-related parties, such as the victim E (V, 53 years old), who is a general director for the same conference, were seated as the representative of the occupants’ representative meeting.

The defendant is required to move from persons related to meetings, such as victims, to attend the meeting, but he/she is not aware of management rules.

“The victim did not comply with the demand of the victim to leave without good cause.”

B. From August 19, 2015, the Defendant’s obstruction of duties and refusal of withdrawal, the same from around August 19, 2015

(A) By the time of 19:30, the same as the above paragraph 2-A.