beta
Text
1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff, who became final and conclusive in the judgment subject to a retrial, filed a lawsuit against the Defendant, including damages, against the Defendant at this court’s 2013da41975. On February 27, 2014, the court of first instance rendered a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim. The said judgment is obvious that the fact that became final and conclusive at that time
2. The plaintiff's assertion is the owner of the trademark of "C", which is the registered trademark of "C," and the defendant was at the position of the representative director of D Co., Ltd. from around December 2, 2005 to May 2008. D manufactures 1,910 pages of the total of 25,807 dollars with "E" trademark similar to "C" trademark on February 2, 2007, and exports them to the E-ray trading company, and then filed a claim against the plaintiff, and D promises not to export the fences attached with "E" to the plaintiff on April 2007.
However, on May 24, 2007, E-mark was added again to D on 26,054 US$2,020. In preparation for any dispute with the Plaintiff, the Defendant has the E- trademark operator pay damages for delay to the Plaintiff on May 24, 2007, changing the E-mark on the order (AT/39-2007) to F. The order (AT/39-207) that changed the above E-mark from May 24, 2007. The completion of the order was forged and altered as if it was ordered to 2,020 US mark attached to E-mark, and actually exported the goods loaded with the E-mark on 5 January 2008. The Plaintiff had the existing business partner pay damages for delay to the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 208 (1) of the Commercial Act. Accordingly, the Defendant and the Plaintiff jointly and severally had the Plaintiff pay damages for delay to the Plaintiff.
Therefore, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking damages against G who held office as a director of this court No. 2011's group 26309 at this court and who held overall control over overseas business affairs, but was sentenced to the judgment dismissing the plaintiff's claim.