1. The defendant shall leave from the building indicated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3.Paragraph 1.

Although the plaintiff allowed the dwelling of the defendant in the building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the building of this case") owned by him and demanded the withdrawal, the defendant's non-compliance with the request can be acknowledged by adding the whole purport of the pleadings to the statements stated in the evidence Nos. 1, 6, and 7. Thus, the defendant is obligated to leave the building of this case as requested by the plaintiff, unless there are special circumstances.

In regard to this, the defendant asserts that the acquisition of the plaintiff's ownership is null and void since the plaintiff escaped from the building of this case, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it, and the defendant's above assertion is rejected.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.