logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.09.13 2018가합428
추심금
Text

1. The defendant stated in the "amount recognized" column in the annexed sheet to the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party, respectively.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. The Plaintiff (Appointed) and the Appointed (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) work for the Korea Materials Inspection Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea Materials Inspection”).

The plaintiffs retired from office, and the plaintiffs did not receive the wages and retirement allowances as stated in the attached Table “amount of recognition” column.

B. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs filed an application for provisional attachment against the Defendant with respect to the payment claim following the inspection and analysis conducted by the Korean Materials Prosecutor (Seoul District Court 2017Kadan11310), and the Changwon District Court accepted the Plaintiffs’ application on September 29, 2017, and decided provisional attachment against the said claim.

C. The Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the Korea Materials Prosecutor seeking the payment of the aforementioned wage and retirement allowance with the Changwon District Court 2017Kadan115241, and the Changwon District Court rendered a favorable judgment against the Plaintiff on November 15, 2017.

Based on the above winning judgment, the Plaintiffs filed an application for the seizure and collection order to transfer the provisional seizure to the original seizure (the Changwon District Court 2017TTTTT 1155), and the Changwon District Court issued the seizure and collection order to transfer the provisional seizure to the original seizure on December 21, 2017, and the above seizure and collection order was served on the Defendant on December 26, 2017.

E. Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiffs who are collection creditors the amount of collection stated in the "amount of collection" in the attached Table and to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum under the Civil Act from May 12, 2018 to September 13, 2018, which is the date following the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case, to the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case, and calculated at the rate of 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date of full payment.

2. Article 208 (3) 2 and Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act of the judgment deemed to be a confession.

3. Partial dismissal;

A. The plaintiffs are listed in the attached Table.

arrow