1. The real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, and 4 and the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 5 shall be indicated by the annexed sheet.

1. In full view of the facts that there is no dispute over the claim for partition of co-owned property, and the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, and 15 (including each number), the plaintiff owned 4/15 shares, 5/15 shares, 3, 4/15 shares, 2/15 shares, 3, D, and E, 3, 4, and 5 shares of the above Defendants as stated in the separate sheet No. 1 and No. 1 and No. 2 of the separate sheet as of June 5, 2018, and sold the above Defendants' shares to Eul, the representative director of Gap, 3, 4, and 5 of the separate sheet to Eul, Eul, and E (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant acquiring intervenor"), and it is recognized that consultation on the method of partition of each real estate listed in the separate sheet as of the closing date of argument between the plaintiff, defendant Eul, and defendant acquiring intervenor, and each of the co-owners as co-owners in the separate list as of the defendant No. 26

2. Co-owned property partition by judgment on the method of partition of co-owned property is in principle in kind, and if it is impossible to divide in kind or in kind, or if the value thereof is likely to be reduced remarkably, an auction may be conducted by ordering an auction. Since there is no proof as to the fact that each real estate listed in the separate sheet is unable to divide in kind or if it is made in kind, the value thereof may be reduced remarkably, each real estate listed in the separate sheet shall be divided in kind.

In other words, the Plaintiff acquired real estate located north of the real estate stated in the attached Tables 1 and 2, and indicated in the attached Tables 1 and 2, among the real estate listed in the attached Tables 3, 4, and 6, and the real estate listed in the attached Tables 1 and 5.