logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.04.27 2017고단512
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 512"

1. On October 17, 2016, the Defendant calls to the victim B at an insular place and calls to the victim B, and “humma is lacking in KRW 1 million to conduct a heart operation.

It shall be repaid with monthly payment at the end of the year when he/she lends money.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he was thought to use it as personal living expenses, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money normally to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 1 million won from the injured party to the national bank account (D) in the name of the accused for the same day from the injured party.

2. On November 29, 2016, the Defendant’s phone call to the victim B at an insular location, and there is a lack of KRW 5.2 million to accept the “E” cosmetic in Daejeon.

The loan made a false statement to the effect that until December 2, 2016, the above KRW 1,00,000,000 as well as KRW 6,200,000,00.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he was thought to use it as personal living expenses, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money normally to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 5,200,000 won from the damaged person to the national bank account (D) in the name of the Defendant for the same day from the damaged person and acquired it by money.

The defendant of "2017 Highest 1023" is a space between the victim FF and the victim F with a work bonus.

1. On May 29, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at the victim’s house of Seo-gu Daejeon-gu G and Dong B 10, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and the Dong 10, stating that “If the father’s family were to have recovered from his/her debt and returned to his/her father at his/her home at his/her own home, it would be said that the father would have borrowed to the extent that the principal and interest would be repaid if the death insurance proceeds of his/her father were to have been paid back on July 2016.”

However, in fact, the defendant is obligated to pay 30 million won to the individual.

arrow