beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
[Criminal Force] On May 15, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten years for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court). The judgment became final and conclusive on May 23, 2014.
【Criminal Facts】
From June 9, 2011 to November 20, 2012, the Defendant is a person who has been engaged in a business to supply a cafeteria, etc. with the trade name of “E” in the name of “E” at the office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul.
1. Around July 1, 2011, the Defendant entered into a contract with the victim F Co., Ltd. F (representative G) to receive the back-up bridges (hereinafter “stock”) through employees of the victim F Co., Ltd., who found in the said “E” office and received the delivery of the money.
(B) The Defendant continued to supply money from July 1, 201 to February 28, 2012) and then, on November 2011, when the Defendant continued to supply money from the victim, the Defendant was obligated to pay 30 million won for the victim’s attempted money, and the Defendant was urged to supply money to the victim several times, and the Defendant’s statement that it would no longer be possible to supply the money. As such, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant continues to supply the money to the victim even if he was in the name of the wife and sold the house.”
However, before entering into a supply contract with the victim, the Defendant already committed an attempted obligation for the fishery processing of Cheongwon Livestock with KRW 16,652,940, and the Defendant failed to settle the attempted obligation amounting to KRW 15,000,000, and KRW 8,145,420, which had been engaged in the supply of the money at the time of entering into the supply contract with the victim. The Defendant was under the status of waiver of the obligation for the attempted obligation amounting to KRW 15,00,000, and KRW 8,145,420, which had been engaged in the distribution of the money. The Defendant received from the provider of the money to supply the money to the Chinese branch, supplied the money to the Chinese branch, etc., and delivered the money to the Chinese branch, etc., and given up the Defendant’s failure to recover the money by themselves.